Tubbs Adventure 21, 25, 30 Snow Shoes

Tubbs Adventure 21, 25, 30 Snow Shoes 

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 14  
[Aug 25, 2021]
shemikasoraya


Strength:

Recommended for slightly packed trails or for snowshoe running. Came undone once but usually has secure mount to the boot. Kind of expensive but if these fit your needs, go for it. Countertop Installation

Weakness:

none so far

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
5
[May 03, 2003]
Christopher
Climber

I used these shoes for the rather long approaches ice climbing in northern Canada. I had serious issues pertaining to the bindings with these snowshoes: 1. The tightening straps are damn near impossible to use with cold fingers. 2. The heel strap kept slipping off of my mountaineering boots, even though the heel of my boot had a crampon welt for the heel strap to fit in. 3. In Canada where we were climbing, the average temperature during the day never got above 0 F and the straps iced over making it impossible no matter how hard you tried to dial in your bindings. So my overall consensus of the binding is that they suck. I diffidently like the Atlas ratchet binding system much better.

OVERALL
RATING
2
VALUE
RATING
3
[Jan 29, 2001]
Neal Boutin
Backpacker

An avid warm weather hiker, I haven't had a good winter activity for years (no more skiing for me). My (soon to be) wife suggested snowshoeing so I started looking into it. I decided on Tubbs shoes as they seemed more rugged than the Atlas shoes of equal price ($165 range). My wife liked that there was a women's specific model.

While shopping around I found a great deal from Campmor. $140 for the 25 inch shoes, men's and women's models. I just had to get them.

We've taken them out for a couple of mountain hikes so far and I'm impressed with them. Once I strap them on, they stay put. My wife's, however, have the bad habit of loosening up from time to time. Usually, the heel strap loosens and slips off of her boot. As the bindings are pretty much the same on our shoes, I'm not yet sure what's going on.

I'm think the heel strap issue has something to do with her boots. The heel tapers in towards the bottom where the strap wants to go and I think it's simply working it's way down as she walks (the rubber lowers of her boots are pretty soft too). My boots are more squared off at the bottom of the heel which seems to work better with that strap (much harder rubber there as well). Something to watch out for anyway.

At 25 inches, these things aren't great at floating on powder (obviously bigger is better here). But for the packed trails and heavier snow these things have been great.

--neal

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Sep 01, 2000]
Glenn
Day Hiker

These shoes have a very good binding system. At 185lbs the 30's work great. Climbing and decending was very good, off canber was alittle tricky but nothing you can't get use to. Overall a great shoe at a great price.

Similar Products Used:

I've looked at others but for the price the Tubbs were the best built and had the best binding system without having to spend the money on a specialized binding.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 13, 2000]
Heather A. Bee
Day Hiker

I have the Adventure 25 series. I believe them to be a good value. My partner has the Atlas 1033s and I think that the Tubbs are as good as far as "floating" on the snow and the Atlas 1033s are significantly more expensive. The only drawback to the Tubbs are the bindings--these are not easy to do with cold fingers and I usually have to have my partner to the final cinching. With any snowshoes I would remind the beginner that they are not meant to completely float on the snow and that it can be a strenuous, but wonderful sport!

Similar Products Used:

Low-end Atlas snowshoes--hated them. Tubbs has some kind of feature that makes the back end "spring up" as you are hiking.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Mar 21, 2000]
Kathleen Helmer
Backpacker

Okay here's the scoop! If you're wanting to try snowshoeing out and you've never been. These are a good priced shoe for the first few times. I think that if you become more involved with snowshoeing you'll want the type that has the clasps that buckle and cinch down. They provide a better fit.

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
2
[Sep 22, 1999]
Tyler McConnell
Day Hiker

I got these as a gift also, for a 125 pounder, these hold up pretty good.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 18, 1999]
John
Day Hiker

Have the LL Bean version. Good quality but a larger shoe is definately more suitable for deep powder. Recommended for slightly packed trails or for snowshoe running. Came undone once but usually has secure mount to the boot. Kind of expensive but if these fit your needs, go for it.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
3
[Apr 14, 1999]
adam
Day Hiker

Are great for hiking on flat trails. also work well for ging up hills. Have had a problem with offcamber trails because the binding system is not rigid enough. Other than that I really like them.

Customer Service

Customer service was good. One of the rivets broke on the bindings and they promptly repared it for me.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jul 28, 1999]
mike pisano
Day Hiker

Good Value, light weight, easy entry

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
Showing 1-10 of 14  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

outdoorreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com