Burton Moto Conventional

Burton Moto Conventional 

DESCRIPTION

Clean, simple, and good to go, right out of the box. The Moto has gained a reputation as the boot to choose for people who ride all terrains. 2d Matrix Liner: Living room couch comfort that won’t sacrifice support. Soft BoneOut Tongue: Allows for cushioning and tweak. 2-Piece DL Outsole: Impact protection with super-grip death lugs. DL Dampening: Better board feel and shock absorption.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 11-18 of 18  
[Jun 28, 2003]
Luke Moroz
Intermediate

Strength:

Light Weight Super Comfy Very Warm Fit Ride LX bindings perfectly Look great

Weakness:

None that i have found

The NEW Moto (2003) boot is the most comfortable boot i have used in eight years of riding.

Similar Products Used:

Burton Ruler

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Mar 04, 2003]
luka paic
Advanced

good but could better

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 05, 2002]
Marcus
Advanced

Strength:

Look super cool, great cusioning and ultra comfortable fit, absorb landing very well, great price, very warm liner,

Weakness:

arent as stiff as other boots, which can be a disadvantage, if yur not a freestlye rider.

Yo this boot is off the hook. I have never had a boot that had more support for my feet. These are a great boot for freestyle riding because, the are super cool looking, and fit like a glove. These boots absorb your landings like a pillow. And are a great price. For me there awsome cuz they look dope for one thing,and are just what im looking for in a boot.

Similar Products Used:

Burton Driver (last boot used)

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Mar 04, 2002]
Sboard4443
Advanced

Strength:

looks, price

Weakness:

gets wet in warm conditions

Great boot for the price.

Similar Products Used:

northwave, ride

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 26, 2002]
guppie
Intermediate

Strength:

heel pads to help reduce heel lift and quick lace system for liner and PRICE from a quality manufacturer

Weakness:

can''''t think of one

Poster my review in 2001 - sorry! So I''''m posting here as well: I haven''''t tried out alot of boots, cuz I don''''t have money to burn, but these boots are pretty darn good for the price! My feet stayed dry and warm all day and I rode 4 days in a row 9am-5pm with lightweight socks (no liners). I have 2001 Ride EX bindings and they fit perfectly. Also, I have skinny ankles and these boots have extra padding at the achilles tendon area built in which helped keep my heels in place, but I need more "heel-staying" support! Overall a good boot for beginners and some intermediate. Considering that I can only take 2-3 trips to the mountain per year (i live in FL) these boots are perfect!

Similar Products Used:

Vans (forgot model)

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 05, 2002]
Daniel Newcombe
Backpacker

Strength:

None

I have just used a pair of new moto''s for a weeks boarding in Italy and I have nothing bad to say about them. They were comfortable, well fitting (lace up liner a bonus), well made, warm, dry and look good in blue and grey, but best of they are excellent value for occasional boarders like myself. I think burton must have worked hard to iron out all the problems from the previous moto because none were apparent.

Similar Products Used:

Old moto, Rossignol, 32''s

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 05, 2002]
Daniel Newcombe
Backpacker

Strength:

None

I have just used a pair of new moto''s for a weeks boarding in Italy and I have nothing bad to say about them. They were comfortable, well fitting (lace up liner a bonus), well made, warm, dry and look good in blue and grey, but best of they are excellent value for occasional boarders like myself. I think burton must have worked hard to iron out all the problems from the previous moto because none were apparent.

Similar Products Used:

Old moto, Rossignol, 32''s

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Dec 14, 2001]
molex
Day Hiker

Strength:

None

I previously reviewed my Burton Moto''s as 01, but it turns out they are ''02 models, so here''s the poop: I''ve ridden these boots once, and have nothing but praise for them so far. The previous models (97-00) got terrible reviews, and I can''t tell you if the deserved it or not. What I can tell you is that the problems described in those reviews (heavy, cold, tight, uncomfortable, stiff, wet feet) must have been addressed by Burton. I rode for 7 hours straight, I''m beginner just on the big slopes so these boots got USED while I was in ''em. End of the day? My feet were dry as a bone, warm, and felt great. Basically, I forgot I was wearing the boots at all. Granted this is the first time I''ve used these boots, so maybe when they break in they''ll suck (doubt it), but for a first time out with 7 hours straight in them, they were great. No blisters, no foot cramps, nada.

Customer Service

Huh? My boots are supposed to serve me? Awesome.

Similar Products Used:

Cheap a$$ Kempers. Suck suck suck suck!

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
Showing 11-18 of 18  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

outdoorreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com